Man City . . . . .

by **NIGHTMARE** Sun 13 Sep - 19:38:13

I'm starting to believe they could be the real deal Shocked

by **yorkie64red** Sun 13 Sep - 19:44:56

Think your right, i really thought that Hughes was on borrowed time after last season,but he seems to have them playing the right way now, it would be good to see someone else pushing for the top spot, having said all that with the players he has signed and the money at his disposal he really should be doing it.

by **hoolahoop** Mon 14 Sep - 4:25:50

yorkie64red wrote:Think your right, i really thought that Hughes was on borrowed time after last season,but he seems to have them playing the right way now, it would be good to see someone else pushing for the top spot, having said all that with the players he has signed and the money at his disposal he really should be doing it.

I still think they will need another season yet but their squad is becoming awesome. I'm not saying Hughes is not a good manager but I think he will find it difficult to weld them together as a team immediately.
Adebayor's behaviour yesterday was beyond contempt and personally I think that Hughes should heavily discipline him for those acts .
For a season or so Manure will remain in the ascendency in that city IMHO, as their game against Spurs showed.

by **NIGHTMARE** Mon 14 Sep - 4:32:05

If Man City are there or there about's in January the top 4 have some pain on
not only because they will spend big again but they don't have to play as many games as the big 4 with not been in the champions league .

by **hoolahoop** Mon 14 Sep - 4:37:40

Nightmare wrote:If Man City are there or there about's in January the top 4 have some pain on
not only because they will spend big again but they don't have to play as many games as the big 4 with not been in the champions league .

That's true , i hadn't factored that in, they should be in at least the top 5

by Dan_the_Owl Mon 14 Sep - 21:23:25

This game against Arsenal was always going to be the true test of whether City were genuine top 4 contenders. I think it's now safe to say we can take them seriously. (Well, apart from Emmanuel Adebayor, what a prick that man is)

by **hoolahoop** Tue 15 Sep - 5:46:01

Dan_the_Owl wrote:This game against Arsenal was always going to be the true test of whether City were genuine top 4 contenders. I think it's now safe to say we can take them seriously. (Well, apart from Emmanuel Adebayor, what a prick that man is)

You can say that again. He needs a lengthy ban to let every player know that this behaviour is not acceptable under any circumstances.

by borophil Tue 15 Sep - 9:28:57

Yeah i had to transfer him out of my fantasy team today. Drogba in instead

by diggerman Mon 21 Sep - 0:52:34

Obviously the "stamp" is a different matter , but i must admit i thought his goal celebration was absolute class.

by **yorkie64red** Mon 21 Sep - 1:05:29

City under the cosh now, Shay Given is having a blinder of a game and keeping them in it, at the moment though there looks like there is only going to be one winner and its not them.

by **yorkie64red** Mon 21 Sep - 1:15:32

There you go, Fletcher makes it 3 - 2. it was coming.

by **yorkie64red** Mon 21 Sep - 1:24:53

Bellamy 3- 3 , Man Utd thrown it away after dominating most of the game Very Happy

by **yorkie64red** Mon 21 Sep - 1:29:35

Owen makes it 4 - 3 .

by pkt_drfc Mon 21 Sep - 1:40:50

yorkie64red wrote:Owen makes it 4 - 3 .

For a neutral that was one of the best games ive ever seen glad i watched it now

by **yorkie64red** Mon 21 Sep - 1:53:29

Yep i bet Hughs is seething though, who you going for in the Chelsea match Pete, i'm going for Spurs, only in that i can't stand Chelsea.

by pkt_drfc Mon 21 Sep - 1:55:38

yorkie64red wrote:Yep i bet Hughs is seething though, who you going for in the Chelsea match Pete, i'm going for Spurs, only in that i can't stand Chelsea.

Spurs to win 3-1. good tatic by fergie really stick on a sub in injury time and the rules state more time does get added on don't know about extra 2 mins like thought its only an extra min they add on

by **yorkie64red** Mon 21 Sep - 1:57:47

Your not a secret manure fan r u Pete Razz

by pkt_drfc Mon 21 Sep - 2:00:31

yorkie64red wrote:Your not a secret manure fan r u Pete

No there there is only one blood running through me and it is rovers blood cheers

by **yorkie64red** Mon 21 Sep - 2:03:01

thank god for that... bounce

by pkt_drfc Mon 21 Sep - 2:05:50

yorkie64red wrote:thank god for that...

I thought for a minute there i was going to have to be setting Steve on to you lol!

by **yorkie64red** Mon 21 Sep - 2:08:41

Think he must be in the bad books from the other night, he seems to have dissapeared, then again he could be working Wink

by pkt_drfc Mon 21 Sep - 2:10:35

yorkie64red wrote:Think he must be in the bad books from the other night, he seems to have dissapeared, then again he could be working

It was a good night though enjoyed it i was still a bit weak last night pale

by **yorkie64red** Mon 21 Sep - 2:26:00

Will have to get Matty out next time, he can show us how to Drink drunken

was a good night though, will have to do it again soon Very Happy

by pkt_drfc Mon 21 Sep - 2:28:12

yorkie64red wrote:Will have to get Matty out next time, he can show us how to Drink was a good night though, will have to do it again soon

by **hoolahoop** Mon 21 Sep - 3:35:18

yorkie64red wrote:Yep i bet Hughs is seething though, who you going for in the Chelsea match Pete, i'm going for Spurs, only in that i can't stand Chelsea.

Would Hughes have been seething if City had snatched the game late into injury time.?
Listening to the whingeing on Talk Sport made me want to phone up and point this out............Jeez some folk in our game are pathetic. Ferguson time would have become Hughes' time if the score had gone the othe way wouldn't it or am I missing something here ? I was at work sounds like a great game though. Sad

by Sponsored content

Man City . . . . .

Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .

Re: Man City . . . . .