Director Steps Down

SkellowRover wrote:I wonder, if Gavin is named a director if he will have to make an annual payment of one of the 2 tiers, just like other directors were told they had to by our 'owners'

Dagenham Rover wrote:C'mon lads no argueing we've just got it sorted

Filo wrote:


Evidence?

donnyroversfc wrote:

Shut up you imbecile!!!! God you are so clueless ffs!!

Dagenham Rover wrote:

hey up thats rich

SkellowRover wrote:

Pmsl, think what you want Filo but it's a fact and part of the reason for summer resignations that i told people on here in private WEEKS before any of you knew about them. When i say something it is fact, unlike someone on the VSC board who wrongly told people that all club loans had been converted into shares and written off when they haven't and when i asked him if he had been officially told this by the club he disappeared and rever replied!!!!

Filo wrote:


A lot of words just to say you have n`t got any evidence

dickos1 wrote:If you want to tell people in confidence then why then come on here saying you know this and that. If you want it all to be private then keep it private. Rather than telling everybody that you know everything but the only evidence is, is that you've told people in private.

dickos1 wrote:Mate, am I not allowed to post in any of your threads now then? Seeing as there's only 6 or 7 posters on here that would be very difficult.

Why do you put lol after every post? You must be forever laughing t yourself

dickos1 wrote:Not much of a forum hoola if people are getting upset that others are entering a discussion on a thread, just because they have contributed to it earlier.
If we all felt like that there wouldn't be a forum

hoolahoop wrote:Just what sort of evidence do you want planting all over a fan's forum that could undermine our club Filo.
Fact is that , like it or not, Skellow informed us of these developments months ago each and every one! That knowledge alone should suggest to you that he is ITK.
Personally I would prefer that Skellow doesn't plaster some of the strange developments that have occurred at the club over the last few years (yes as long as that) either on here or the VSC but he does feel the need to challenge what he would see as misconceptions from time to time..........that is his prerogative.

However I am pleased that he doesn't feel the need to fully develop and explain how or why he knows facts and merely challenges folks points of view.

Filo wrote:


The thing that is undermining our club is people posting things they say are fact, telling us all that he`s told the clique in private and then members of the clique coming on and telling us it`s all true, without actually telling anyone anything, if you really wanted our club to prosper then all you ITK`s on Skellow supposed knowledge, including Skellow should come clean and put it out in the open for the rest of the fan base to make an informed decision, Chinese whispers are n`t being helpful at all

SkellowRover wrote:I wonder, if Gavin is named a director if he will have to make an annual payment of one of the 2 tiers, just like other directors were told they had to by our 'owners'

SPROTYROVER wrote:

Can someone (as he is off fishin) explain what Skellow means by this, amIi right to assume that the directors have to contribute to the running of the club at one of two levels depending on their share ownership?